Week 6
1. Academic Search Complete
a) I
searched MRSA and got 8192 results, way too many
b) I limited
my search to scholarly peer reviewed journals from 2010 to 2012 and got 2891
results, still too many
c) I limited
to academic journals and got 2887 results
d) I added
and prevent* to my search and got 482 results
e) I limited
the results to the United States and got 26 results, this is what I will work
with
Descriptive:
This article
provides information about my topic that is different from what I have previously
found. It explores the possibility for a vaccination against MRSA. This article
is written for someone with a little background information on the subject and
some science background, however I believe someone without prior information
could understand most of it.
Evaluative:
·
This is a peer-reviewed article that was
published in an academic journal; I believe the information to correct and
accurate.
·
I chose this article because it explores options
of preventing MRSA that I have not previously found. It has a unique
perspective and explains the antigens in a way that I can easily understand.
·
I believe this information is accurate, the
resources used are clearly cited and from my knowledge of peer-reviewed
articles it has been confirmed.
·
I believe this information is objective and not
bias, it is scientific information that has been researched.
·
This article was published in 2011, which fits
into my time frame of finding the most current information available about my
topic.
Citation:
Kobayashi,
S.D., and DeLeo, F.R. (2011). Between bedside and bench, A MRSA-terious
enemy among us. Nature Medicine, 17,
168-169.
2. Research Question: What is MRSA?
3. Three database annotations
1. Descriptive:
This article
explains the impact of overuse of antibiotics in both the medical field and in
farm and agriculture. This article explains why we should be concerned about
MRSA and the overuse of antibiotics is creating more antibiotic resistant
infections. This is a good source for my research because it provides background
information on antibiotics and how they are causing antibiotic resistant
infections that are being spread through our food as well as through the
community. This article is written and can be easily understood by the general
public, however directed at biology teachers.
Evaluative:
·
The author of this article is a research
associate involved in molecular biology at Princeton University, I find the
information to be credible.
·
I chose this article because it has the
background on antibiotics that the other articles I have used are lacking.
·
This article was published for biology teachers
and I find it to be credible and accurate, it is well cited with current
references.
·
The information is factual and objective.
·
This article was published in 2011 and fits
within my scope of research.
Citation:
Stein, R.
(2011). Antibiotic Resistant: A global, interdisciplinary concern, The American
Biology Teacher, 73(6), 314-321. BioOne.
2. Descriptive:
This study
focuses on children in hospitals carrying the MRSA bacteria. It covers children
admitted into an intensive care unit over a three-year period. Children have a
lower risk factor of developing MRSA than adults, however children that are
hospitalized have a higher risk factor than adults. Preventing MRSA among
children is a priority and precautions should be taken, as their death rate is
higher than adults once they get the infection. This study was written for
someone that has previous knowledge of the bacteria and has a scientific
background. This study has information that was not available in previous
research, by relating the bacteria to children.
Evaluative:
·
These authors are scientists that have been
published in many medical journals and are found to be credible.
·
I chose this study because it has information on
how MRSA effects children, while most of my research has been on adults.
·
I trust the accuracy of this information because
it was published in The Oxford Textbook of Medicine , which is a credible
Journal.
·
This study was conducted on children admitted to
an intensive care unit of a hospital and has a view that I have not found much
research on. The authors are objective and did the study over a three-year
period.
·
This study was published in 2011, which fits in
my scope of research for the most up to date information.
Citation:
Milstone AM,
Goldner BW, Ross T, Shepard JW, Carroll KC, Perl TM. (2011). Methicillin-resistant
staphylococcus aureus colonization and risk of subsequent
infection in critically Ill children: Importance of preventing nosocomial
methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus transmission, Clinic Infectious
Disease, 53(9):853-9. Faculty of 1000 Biology.
3. Descriptive:
This study
focuses on people that have been hospitalized for MRSA and evaluates the were
hospitalized the following year for MRSA. It showed that 114 out of 482 people
had infections return within a year of the first one. The study shows that
people who have MRSA are high risk to have an infection return and need to take
greater precautions in prevention. This study was written for someone with a
scientific background and someone that has knowledge of the bacteria. This
study adds to my research by showing that people with the infection once are
more likely to get it again.
Evaluative:
·
These authors have published studies in many
scientific journals and are credible.
·
I chose this study because it follows people
that have had this infection before and that they are more likely to get it
again, which covers a point of my research that I had not covered yet.
·
The information in this study is supported by
research data, and the study is cited
in other research about my topic.
·
The information is objective and based on
factual documented information.
·
This study was published in 2011, which supports
the current information I am looking for on my topic.
Citation:
Huang, S.S.,
Hinrichsen, V.L., Rupak, D., Spurchise, L, Miroshnik, I., Nelson, K., Platt, R.
(2011)
Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection and hospitalization
in high-risk patients in the year following detection, Plos One, 6(9):e24340.
BIOSIS.
4. My experience:
In my
experience in researching with specific databases, I found some easier to use
than others. The Wiley database I did not like, it was hard to navigate and the
interface was not very clear. BIOSIS was user friendly and I found it easy to
narrow my search results down to under 50, which made my research easier. I used
the feature of narrowing my search results to specific dates for this assignment,
which helped in getting the most current information about my topic. The
process of narrowing the searches to the United States and date ranges are
things that I have not previously done and made a great difference in the
result.